Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Evaluating 21st Century Skills

Overall, I am impressed by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. They certainly have an impressive list of members and partners; groups which should be on the cutting edge of technology. Identifying and describing the "Six Key Elements of 21st Century Learning" and illustrating the "Bridge to 21st Century Learning" was helpful to educators like myself who are new to learning about technology integration. Additionally, I liked the fact that the Partnership has created "Nine Steps to Build Momentum" rather than just telling teachers that they need to figure out a way to implement those key elements on their own. A quote I appreciated from the Report and Mile Guide said it best; "Infusing dynamic, real-world contexts into classroom learning will invigorate teacher and student engagement." (http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/images/stories/otherdocs/p21up_Report.pdf p. 5).

Some states that are involved in Partnership initiatives surprised me, since they are not as well known for their educational standards. By no means do I intend to write off all the hardworking teachers in more rural states like West Virginia or Wisconsin, but I know the realities that schools everywhere face when it comes to getting the equipment and access needed to get a program like this off the ground. Largely, it seems as if these states' participation is supported by their governors. This is important because we all know that schools depend on political actions and is instrumental in building said momentum and preparing citizens to one day be productive contributors to society. 

One aspect I thought was a bit odd were the missing success stories. A link is provided, alas, no success stories! Also considering how many publications cover the Partnership for 21st Century Skills as referenced on the homepage, I am curious as to why my state, Maryland, hasn't become more active. On the Tools and Resources page, the Partnership claims they "conduct extensive, ongoing outreach to a broad range of individuals and groups within the education community, including education experts, teachers, administrators, students, businesses, community groups, university faculty and researchers, under-served community representatives, after-school program representatives, and policy makers." So what's the deal Maryland? I'm new to technology integration, but surely someone more significant than me knows about opportunities such as this. What can we do to get involved?

I suppose that classroom teachers like myself are responsible as well. We can't push all the blame on our state curriculum writers or Boards of Education. Like new employees bring technologies to the business world, teachers need to maximize student exposure and create assignments as well as assessments that use Information and Communication Technologies in the classroom in order to prepare our students for the real, 21st Century world. If we do it in our schools it will trickle up!

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was also a bit disspointed in the website. I expected to see links to lesson plans, success stories, and curriculum maps. It read to me like the opening chapter of a book - but the rest of the book was missing. (or more accurately, probably not written yet.) I attended the Intel Teach to the Future academy a few years ago and was impressed how Intel Corporation was really integrating its technology into real world lesosn plans and school curriculum. But lately, I feel the emphasis has been on hardware and less on software. Maybe these big corporation feel that their job is to create the box, and our job (teachers) is to fill it.

    Todd Seip

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that success stories make the organization's mission more credible and would help to persuade others to come on board or to take more stock in what they are trying to accomplish. I also found it interesting that some states are represented while others are not. It would be interesting to know how the states were approached and what reactions they received from each state along with the reasons the states that are not participating chose that route. I agree with Todd's comments that it seems like they have a vision but need to take many more steps in order to see results.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was also impressed with the mission of the the company. I appreciate the effort they are showing for technology in education. Their state list seemed much smaller than I would have guessed. It would be nice to see them partnering with many more states than they currently are. My state was not listed as one of them.
    I agree with you that teachers are the ones that can make the most difference. We must make it a priority of ours to incorperate technology into our lessons so that we are setting the students up for their future, not ours.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi April,

    I looked on the website to find out more about why these states are listed as initializing these technology standards. I focused on Wisconsin and the Wisconsin state superintendent approved these standards and mandated that every school district would implement these standards. Like you, I wonder where these states get their money to bring in more technology. Is it better budgeting on their end? I think that these standards should be made a federal guideline for all states to follow if we want every child in America to be globally competitive.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You addressed some common frustrations for us as we investigated this website. I thought we would find more practical information and I certainly would like to read about the success stories. Like anything, I'm sure it is a work in progress, so I will continue to check the site for updates.

    ReplyDelete
  7. April,

    Now that you mention it, there were no success stories from the program. I didn't even realize that was missing until I read your blog. That is something that would help motivate more states to buy in to it. It would also help to have some data that showed how the students have benefited from the initiatives.
    I think that the program gives a good framework to address these 21st century skills. I think that it is a good start but will need to make some adjustments.

    ReplyDelete